Wednesday, 8 February 2012

Being "open minded-

Most of us claim to be "open-minded". What does that mean?

Probably, a definition on which we can all agree is that being open-minded means being open to different ideas and to different perspectives on life. But, is that how we apply the definition in practice, especially to ourselves?

When I look at how we put the concept into action, it seems to me that being open-minded, more often than not, means:
I agree with my own ideas, even when they run contrary to common current views. As for those who disagree with my ideas, poor people, they must change their mind or shut up, eh?

What do you think? Are you open-minded? In what way?

3 comments:

  1. open mindedness is really about acceptance. It is acceptance that allows us to hear out the thoughts of others no matter how differing from your own they might be, and consider them without having to push your own thoughts upon that person. Open mindedness allows you to think critically, but also understand that when it comes to thoughts and opinions there is naturally a very personal and subjective side . To listen without having to speak.

    ReplyDelete
  2. So, let us look at the Shafia trial. It is not what motivated my question, but it is an excellent example.

    Are we being open minded in understanding what motivated the convicted perpetrators to do what they did? Can we see their point of view?

    All I see right now is accusations, name-calling and just plain "Those evil guys got what they deserved". Is that part of being open minded?

    ReplyDelete
  3. I think being open minded means to be able to listen to other's opinions and thoughts thoughtfully and really trying to understand why other people have differing opinions from the norm, or what you yourself believe in or think is right, different from the norm or not. Being opened minded could mean other's opinions might change your own viewpoints alot, slightly or not at all. For me, it is usually being able to listen to someone's thoughts that are different than mine, considering them and then deciding whether or not I agree with them. If I disagree however, that doesn't mean I assume that person is wrong, it just means we may see certain things different. I think when it comes to harming a living thing, moreso a human being, then that is when the line must be drawn for what is 'wrong'.

    ReplyDelete